Originally by: dgfhdfg

---

Hmm... POSes goin down almost every day, i think, and it looks like nobody have big problems to take down enemy POSes when you have enemy heavely outnumbered, exept coalition. Am i right?

---

Originally by: Ediz Daxx

---

It takes skills to kill ships vs ships.. it doesnt take skills when the POS is doing the dirty work and then people claim that they are killing massive amounts of hostiles.

---

Originally by: Drilla

---

Nice stats considering LV has killed 12 RA battleships last 3 days while loosing 13 ...

---

Originally by: Poison Beam

---

Red Alliance (homeless)

seriously guys, you are pathetic.

---

Originally by: Drilla

---

Haha - you walked straight into that trap.

I liked who you are all up about that I under played our losses and didnt notice that I actually posted you lost twice what the OP wrote of RA losses - you can check them yourselves on eve-ams.

I guess both sides play the number game then?

---

Originally by: Drilla

---

Yapp yapp

Below is the RA Battleship losses for C-J6MT (not even other systems) for Friday and Saturday alone - and on top of that these are only from the LV and ASCN killboards - havnt bothered checking the rest as you get the pic of the nber accurate numbers in the OP.

Besides - siege of C-J started The 2nd. but I guess RA had too many losses the 3rd to admit that.

Quote:

---

2006.08.05-19:12:00 SephiriotH REUNI0N ScorpionC-J6MT
2006.08.05-14:55:00 OSTOR R.u.S.H. Raven C-J6MT
2006.08.04-23:22:00ZoronREUNIONApocalypseC-J6MT
2006.08.04-23:20:00MACTEPSolar DragonsApocalypseC-J6MT
2006.08.04-22:37:00StefoudemonRussian SOBRApocalypseC-J6MT
2006.08.04-22:25:00KorshunR.u.S.H.DominixC-J6MT
2006.08.04-19:22:00 Gobluin R.u.S.H. Armageddon C-J6MT
2006.08.04-09:48:00 BarmulR.u.S.H. Tempest C-J6MT
2006.08.04-09:38:00 Faithless F UA Industry Armageddon C-J6MT
2006.08.04-22:25:00KorshunR.u.S.H.DominixC-J6MT

---

---

Originally by: nync

---

Total losses for both sides from 04.08.2006 till 05.08.2006 DT in C-J6MT and neighboring systems :

---

Originally by: Aeon Yakati

---

Originally by: Obivan Efa

---

Respect? Funny to hear from the Coalition who fights 15 to 1 about respect and honesty...
.

---

I find it surprising to see so many people hammer on the 15 vs 1 statistic while totally 'forgetting' the advantages a POS defender has here.

With current POS mechanics and the proper timing (of strontium) I personally could keep an alliance like BoB occuppied shooting POS for several weeks at least. And that's just me and the POS then.

If I were to be the CEO of a dedicated 50 man corp, those few weeks would be extended considerably.

Therefor my respect goes to the coalition who keep on trying despite the immense advantages a devoted POS alliance has here.

It is clear the POS mechanics are not working out as intended and heavily favour the rich (# of POS) and (a few) devoted POS managers with alarmclocks.

CCP: Randomize the Reinforced time.

---

Originally by: Aeon Yakati

---

Originally by: Beyond Horizon

---

If you are such a big coalition fanboi, why did you leave -v- for BoB then?

---

So everyone whoi's pointing out a few, commonly forgotten, POS warfare mechanics automatically falls in your definition of a 'fanboi' ?

However if that's an attempt to troll, try again.

---

Originally by: FREAKZILLA1

---

congrats on ur lameness today RA.

---

Originally by: The Enslaver

---

Originally by: dj lightning

---

Good job RA keep it up

Might have to come down for some targets after TCF have been crushed

---

You guys are obviously blissfully unaware of how closely TCF and RA are affiliated, then

---

Originally by: Velios

---

ALL dread losses lost in this way will be petitioned.

---

Originally by: c0rn1

---

Logging off and client crashing and not being able to log back in are 2 different things.
they didnt log off there. they crashed when they jumped in and since they didnt have an attack timer, they should've disappeared before RA could've probed em down and move the fleet there.

---

Originally by: Amerame

---

It's not a problem, the coalition has a fool proof strategy, bring 400 people, lag the system to death, and if your enemy happen to be able to lock you despite this, they'll petition the loss.

---

Originally by: Rover Vitesse

---

Originally by: La Tortura

---

To the all the pilots from so-called "Coalition" who propose some changes to POS'es here.
Unfortunatelly you guys suggest and demand to/from CCP all wrong things... well, less lag isn't wrong, but that's all. You ask for "to make it easier to remove them with less ships, or a random hardened state, or just something that enables the attackers to use less ships (and therefore less lag)" etc etc etc. It wouldn't work. It probably will be worse for yourself, than for RA.

What you really should demand from CCP is that these restrictions, like less POS hitpoints or random outofreinforcedstate are to be applied only to RA poses, but not to yours. This way you probably will happily win this war.

---

Way to misquote and pull everything out of context.

I was offering solutions to enable the tides of war to turn both ways. If there is simply NO WAY to remove an entrenched defender *note: I said NO WAY, not VERY HARD*, then don't you agree that something is wrong? I made a well structured and intelligent post; if you can not or will not reply in like manner, then you may as well not bother replying at all. Remember, THINK !, TYPE!, READ AGAIN! and then hit the POST REPLY! button.

---